How we rank
Our method is about cashout logic, not marketing promises. Here is exactly what we look at and what we refuse to claim.
The principle
We rank on how clearly and quickly an operator moves a player from cashout request to money received. Because payout speed depends on approval and settlement separately, we assess both and never merge them into a single hype number.
The four criteria
Cashout logic
How clearly the operator explains approval, settlement and the difference between them.
Payment rails
Which rails are supported and how each behaves after approval, including cut-off effects.
Terms clarity
Whether wagering, expiry, caps and withdrawal limits are stated plainly enough to check.
Support access
Whether help is reachable during the hours payouts are actually processed.
What we weigh most
On a payout-speed site, terms clarity and cashout logic carry the most weight, because they are what a reader can verify and what changes the real waiting time. A generous banner over vague withdrawal rules ranks below a modest offer with rules you can actually read.
What we will not do
- We do not claim to have deposited, withdrawn or tested any operator unless real test data is supplied and attributed.
- We do not publish payout times, licence numbers or ratings we cannot source.
- We do not let a commercial arrangement buy the top position. See our Advertising Disclosure.
- We do not present placeholder operators as real, licensed or safe.
The operators currently shown on this site are layout placeholders. The ranking order demonstrates the method. It is not a verified judgement of real brands.
Evidence and updates
When we rank real operators, we record a source and a checked date for every material claim, and we separate operator-stated facts from anything we observe first hand. We refresh volatile details such as offers regularly and run a broader review on a schedule. Our sourcing standard is set out in the Editorial Policy, and errors are handled through Corrections.
Why order can change
Rankings are not permanent. If an operator changes its terms, slows its payouts or loses a payment rail, its position can move. We keep a record of changes so a ranking shift can be explained rather than quietly made.